W.B. - True, but for purposes of clarification, you should note the following:
Acoustic waves are mechanical waves, and their behavior depends on mechanical properties of materials. If the velocities of two kinds of acoustic waves: longitudinal and shear are known, all so-called Lamé constants (that describes mechanical properties of material) can be calculated. The situation is much more complicated (but better from the point of view of finger recognition), if we have to do this with a finger lying on the sensor plate. A person's finger has a very complicated structure: the outer, or dead layer of the finger's skin is made from a very hard material, called keratin. Keratin is elastic due to its structure, but has mechanical properties very different from the properties of water. Yet, it is connected to thicker layer of material (live skin tissue) that has properties similar to water. The finger's inner structure is very complicated, containing muscles, blood vessels, bone, etc. It should be noted that the optical and electrical features of finger are not very special and can be copied with other materials. (Note: I have discussed this with others, who have conducted studies on this subject). In contrast, the mechanical parameters are not easy to copy, if at all, and the associated behaviors of this structure are probably impossible to accurately reproduce.
Using our existing prototypes, we have determined that material (and probably structure) differences are causing strong difference (variance) in the amplitude of the acoustic signal scattered from the skin lying on the solid state surface, when compared to other artifacts. Furthermore, it was also noted that there were significant differences in the "character" of the signal (this can be shown in FFT, among others). It is easy to assume that these two points are true, because mechanical properties of skin are very different from mechanical properties of artificial finger. However, the situation is much more complicated, since we have no theoretical description for a phenomena that I am calling "contact scattering". Moreover, we do not know which parameters are causing what; the object's material or its structure. Indeed, we were very surprised at the results of the initial testing with shear waves used in the prototypes of the solid-state device.
From my point of view, we are only scratching the surface of a large range of possibilities that might become available through phenomena such as contact scattering. This will become clearer and many questions answered as our research continues. Even so, the knowledge we have acquired through our research to date has enabled us to propose a unique and powerful new technical approach to fingerprint scanning and recognition that far exceeds the capabilities of existing conventional technologies. The concepts and technologies for this new device are proven. Now, it is just a matter of design and implementation to develop a device in the optimal configuration. I think, that it will certainly be possible to create such device quicker, than to determine all the answers and explanations from a theoretical perspective. And, this explanation was limited to only those issues concerning the "material and its structure" recognition.
D.C. - Optel's ability to determine the "living" state of the object being scanned effectively rules out a cost-effective approach for using a gel appliqué, as it must not only match the fingerprint, but 'live' tissue acoustic characteristics as well. This is especially true when you consider that the latter is the result of technology and developments that are proprietary to Optel's new technical approach and, therefore, will be virtually impossible to acquire without costly research or other less ethical means (which should also be a costly proposition). To augment the inherent 'live' tissue test in analyzing the returns from acoustic emissions, Optel's new approach also has the ability to check for pulse, which it can match with volumetric changes in the blood vessels that it scans within the subject's finger.
Finally, and this is something that has only briefly been mentioned within the last week or so, Optel should also have the ability to check for biometric changes that are typically associated with an individual's stress level. Therefore, in select mid- to high-security applications, Optel's design might also provide an indicator of subject duress by comparing selected biometric data captured during the subject's initial enrollment and subsequent entries with the current data. This can easily be used as a flag to notify security of a potential problem.
W.B.: This is also correct. The ensuing paragraphs provide a more detailed explanation of our position:
Signal scattered from finger contains information coming not only from the contact area of finger and sensor surface of the solid-state device, but also from structures lying deeper in the finger, which will be delayed. Moreover, it also contains data about the changes in time, which is exclusive to our application of ultrasound as a scanning medium.
In our experiments we demonstrated that changes in time caused by blood flow (pulse) could be used for detection of living fingers, even in the primitive versions of our software. At this point, this functionality is working well, allowing the detection of artificial fingerprints on a thin layer of gel applied to a real finger. Yet, even here, I am sure that we have just scratched the surface of what might prove to be a wide range of possibilities that can be detected and applied here:
In earlier testing, we detected something that could only be described as "global" changes in the signal and were not able to detect fine changes. As our technology, design and testing evolves, it will allow us to detect and describe how blood is flowing through the vessels of the finger. We also note that blood must flow in the form of three-dimensional waves that have a shape, which is surely a characteristic that has a high probability of being unique to each person, much like retinal scans or large vein scans of the hand. Furthermore, it appears to be a very realistic to believe that we will also be able to be detect and analyze emotional (behavioral) and/or other physiological changes that impact the "character of blood flow" of a given subject. Examples of these include, but are not limited to, changes caused by stress/duress (behavioral) and illness (physiological).
We also know that acoustic signals reflected from the finger also contain information coming from the inside of the finger, depending on the time it is received and the nature of the received wave. However, since we still have a great deal of research to do in this area, we can only speculate on the possibilities offered by this particular capability. For example, we believe it is possible to capture and analyze information received from the finger's internal structure and, assuming this is true, it should then be possible to reconstruct images of that structure. However, we have just begun research in this area, so we still have many more questions than answers regarding its operation and potential.
Yet, to truly replicate a person's finger in order to create a viable 'fake', somebody must have definite answers to these questions and more. Furthermore, the must have the capability to construct the artificial finger replicating many of the features in the subjects' fingers in a cost effective manner. So, this process would need to be created on a production scale, since a single reproduction of a subject's finger would almost certainly be cost preclusive. Fortunately, even current state of the art technology will not even come close to considering such a construction, or re-construction, as the case may be.
Some might propose that cloning technology might allow for the replication of a real subject's finger, and that this could be done on a scale that might make it cost-effective. Yet, even a cloned copy of a real finger would contain internal and external variations in structure that could be detected to prevent fraud. Furthermore, for such an approach to be feasible, it would be necessary to cause the blood flow in the 'replicated' finger to be exactly as in the real one. In truth, there are probably even more points that must be considered in order to realize the possibility of finger replicas, as we have described above, which only serves to further compound the problem. Such a possibility does not appear to be a realistic goal for the foreseeable future... especially at the level of exactitude that would be required.
While we will concede that that our approach and resultant capabilities may seem a bit "esoteric" now, it is only because very few considered such a possibility as a viable alternative for a biometrics application. As a result, very few have conducted research in this or a related area. Yet, biometrics are only one of the technical applications for the results of our research. We have many possibilities to consider in terms of technical applications from a medical perspective, just as we have from a physical perspective in applications such as non-destructive testing. Given the findings of our research to date, such applications appear to be within the realm of possibilities, with great potential for new gains in efficiency and cost-effectiveness. After all, we have just scratched the surface in terms of the potential for discoveries in this new area.
Additional comments: It is important to note that even people with very poor fingerprints that cannot be detected, resolved, and/or captured with any existing conventional fingerprint scanner, are viable candidates for using our proposed fingerprint scanning approach. These users are capable of generating sufficient unique scattering of sound waves to allow for the capture and reconstruction of a resolvable fingerprint image. To date, we have concentrated our discussions on fingerprint recognition using a conventional imaging approach. However, future discussions will focus on an innovative new imaging approach based, in part, on the application of holographic technology.
Finally, it is also important to note that all of the capabilities and features discussed in Optel's approach to "liveness" detection, above, are inherent to ultrasound. As such, they do not require the addition of any new elements or components, other than that which is in the actual device. Modifications, should they be necessary, would be limited to software changes for additional signal analyses. In certain cases, it might also be necessary to improve the amplifiers and filters to enhance its ability to receive weaker signals, such as those from internal structures of the finger. In the solid-state version of the device this should be very easy to do. We are also considering the development of a more suitable device configuration that will allow for "comfortable" detection of all finger features. Such devices might no longer be called "fingerprint" readers, but more aptly called "finger" or "hand" readers.
Copyright © 1989 - 2020 Optel. All rights reserved.
Limited, registered in the Companies Register by the regional court Wroclaw Fabryczna, VI Industrial Section of KRS, under the number 0000124439,
NIP: PL 8981047033, REGON 008375538, operating capital 364,500 PLN